The Reform of Intercultural Generosity

The Bridgely Declaration

We, as leaders representing internationally connected nonprofits, mission agencies and churches, believe that it is time to radically transform cross-cultural charity and mission.

Intercultural relationships can heal the world. Effective generosity, the type that liberates and builds capacity, is needed. But the current approaches are falling far short of their potential to do good — and sometimes they cause harm.

Despite decades of progress against poverty, the world remains grievously fractured: Some children surf TikTok while others die from dirty water. Hundreds of millions of people in abject poverty struggle to survive – unable to meet basic needs. Poverty statistics are too familiar.

Everyone is aware, but so few take effective action. Tens of millions of people from wealthier countries have traveled cross-culturally for humanitarian or missional purposes. Three-quarters of them claim that those experiences were “life-changing.” People give, but what is the result?

Sadly, cross-cultural charity and mission have a checkered past. Cultural imperialism often hides in the guise of mission, foisting ideologies of the economically dominant culture upon vulnerable people. Work to help “the poor” is riddled with unintended consequences, and often undermines the dignity and initiative of the people it aims to serve. Cross-cultural travel is sometimes marked by hero narratives instead of humility. Government foreign aid is derailed by corruption, and international nonprofits struggle with inefficiency. But these criticisms are not new.

  • Failure to appreciate local assets and capacities
  • Failure to discover the local vision, initiative or instill local ownership
  • Displacing or undermining local producers/businesses
  • Creating dependencies and lack of sustainability
  • Reinforcing “marred identities” (the poor as needy victims; the rich as benevolent heroes)
  • Turning “the poor” into products, especially children in child sponsorship
  • Lack of monitoring, evaluation or learning systems
  • Subordination of local community to foreign, money-powered agendas
  • Nonprofit inefficiency, bureaucracy and thus low yield of value to the “beneficiaries”
  • Pandering to a hero narrative, accommodating the pride of the non-poor
  • Lack of accountability and/or transparency
  • Failure to listen to those we claim to serve

²White Man’s Burden, Dead Aid, Walking with the Poor, When Helping Hurts, Toxic Charity, Amateurs without Borders

Generous and good people have been sufficiently chastised for their “toxic charity,” and the well-intended have been warned that their helping sometimes hurts. The critiques of cross-cultural generosity are necessary, but so are solutions. It is not enough to lambast mission trips as poverty tourism and point the wagging finger of expertise at the “amateurs without borders.” It is time for solutions.

Despite the choppy history, we affirm the beauty of intercultural relationships and their power to change lives. Although charity may become toxic, it is still a virtue when done well. Helping people in need is a central commitment of Christian faith.

Faith without deeds is dead.

Faith without love is nothing.

The command to love our neighbor is a command.

Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead (James 2:15-17, NIV).

… if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing (1 Corinthians 13:2b-3, NIV).

On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

“What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”

He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’, and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’”

“You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”

But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’

“Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”

The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”

Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.” (Luke 10:25-37, NIV)

If our love for the vulnerable is sincere, if we want to see the marginalized gain access, or those struggling in extreme poverty uplifted, then we must be driven by the question,

“Where is the path to restoration?”

Vulnerable and economically poor people need the leaders of nonprofit and missional organizations to be innovators. Leaders with system-disrupting courage. Leaders who are willing to reinvent their organizations and transfer power to the communities they exist to serve.

True empowerment, not just rhetoric but self-sacrificing action, trusts others with key decisions. Most international development or mission organizations evolved into layers of structure, system and process to operate as go-betweens, as bridges connecting a world of donors to a world of need. But the old bridges are decaying, heavy with cost and crumbling at their philosophical foundations. The world today presents new possibilities for light, clean, agile and localized bridges.

As leaders involved in cross-cultural nonprofit or mission work,

We affirm...

Dignity

We commit to radically uphold the dignity of people in low-income communities. We reject ideologies that present “the poor” as objects of benevolence. Instead, we empower work that puts people at the center of their own growth and development.

Relationships

We facilitate relationships to change lives and connect communities to promote intercultural solidarity.

Listening

Featured organizations must listen systematically to those they claim to serve, capturing insights and feedback for continuous improvement.

Local First

We rally support toward locally initiated work because local ownership is the key to sustainability and local solutions are best to solve local challenges.

Transparency

We require transparency as it creates both trust and accountability. No hype, no spin, no hero narratives.

Decentralization

We connect front-line groups, eliminating archaic institutional structures, to gain efficiency and therefore impact.

We support
those who are...

Unleashing

the power of mutually transformative and healthy intercultural relationships

Strengthening

local-to-local connected communities built on trust and transparency

Empowering

a world full of good people to achieve their various missions for uplifting the vulnerable

Catalyzing

the end of extreme poverty alongside countless local leaders

Bambang Budijanto
Indonesia
Asia Evangelical Alliance | General Secretary/CEO
Josh Chamale
Guatemala
UNUM International | Executive Director & Founder
Daniel Rolfe
United States
Mountain Springs Church | Senior Pastor